I'm reading Letters From Watson, which is a substack mailing list sending out the Holmes stories in chronological order. And right now we're on The Noble Bachelor. One thing that caught my eye was this exchange. The client has just told them everything he knows (which is not much) and Holmes announces that he knows what happened to the missing woman. Watson is mystified, and says:
In other words, Holmes knows what's happened not because he is So Much Smarter Than Everyone Else, but because ... he's got experience with people going missing in weird circumstances.
"But I have heard all that you have heard."
"Without, however, the knowledge of pre-existing cases which serves me so well."
In other words, Holmes knows what's happened not because he is So Much Smarter Than Everyone Else, but because ... he's got experience with people going missing in weird circumstances.
no subject
Date: 2023-02-03 01:20 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2023-02-03 04:53 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2023-02-03 09:36 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2023-02-04 05:54 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2023-02-04 07:14 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2023-02-04 05:21 pm (UTC)From:Too many adaptations seem to forget that Holmes is a man of science, with all that implies in terms of experimentation, learning, and disseminating information, and instead make him some kind of incomprehensible genius who relies on instincts no one else has or can develop.
Adaptations also seem to forget that he doesn't always "win." Adler got the better of him. There were one or two cases where he solved the mystery only after the key person died. Occasionally he deliberately chooses not to present the solution he's reached. He's not superhuman, and even intelligence plus a heaping handful of specialised information don't always give him the answer, or give it in time, or in a way that leads to justice.